Sizzling Sex
October 31, 2008
The renowned sex and relationships expert Dr. Pan Spurr has revealed a few secrets in there latest publication. Keeping in mind the experience and expertise Dr. Spurr has in dealing with couples having difficulty in their sexual relationships thesesecrets are what many may need to bring back the spark and the sizzle in their sexual relationship.
Dr. Spurr recommends three positions to have the best and most sensual sexual experience on could possibly have. Let’s begin with the first and most sensual experience ‘the resting dog’ position. In this position the man is Dr. Spurr recommends that many women love to do it the doggy style because many women like the deep penetration that tickles their G-spot and cervix. However, a little experimenting can take this position a tad further to deliver much more pleasure Move on to the ‘resting dog’ position. In this position the gal goes down on her forearms with the hips and pelvis arched back even further. This position will stimulate her G-spot delivering the most fantastic sexual experience ever.
The experiment with a position called the Mount says Dr. Spurr. This entails helping her up on a mount such as the back of a sofa or chair and does require a bit of strength. Once she is up there ease yourself (from a standing position, naturally) between her legs and engage in a bit of foreplay before attempting penetration. Remember to hold her hips very firmly to balance her or she will fall backward onto the seat of the sofa. This raunchy position is a good enough stimulation given the thought that you are trying something other than the conventional.
The next most stimulating position is called ‘Split the Whisker’. You need to be a bit flexible to enjoy this position. You will have to crouch on your knees while she lies on her back and rests her leg on your shoulder. You then need to hold her hips or thighs to control the thrusting action and to prevent yourself slipping out of her. You can so this on the bed or the floor for maximum pleasure.
Submit rating:
(2 votes, average: 2.50 out of 5)
Loading ...
she is really hot .sexy babe
good advice and info.
angel 4-ever!!
^_^
definitely not hot. talented, yes—but physically attractive, no.
Impulse eating is a HUGE problem for us.
I teach the Mediterranean diet for Americans, and find that they lower their cholesterol, control weight, and stabilize glucose with this approach.
Even with the sumptuous foods they eat, we can learn how to control those cravings.
Something we are missing in this search, however, is that the Mediterranean diet is NOT just about the food. It is also about the habits of healthy eating.
How you eat is just as important as what you eat, and this forms the core reason we see the successes we do with this approach.
BRENDA SONG IS SMOLIN’ HOT..A TRUE ASIAN BEAUTY..NATURAL SWEET HEART
I KNEW ASHLEY TISDALE AND KIM RHODES WERE GOOD SINGERS..THEN I HEARD BRENDA,..SHE HAS A SOFT, ENCHANTING VOICE THAT MATCHES HER GREAT LOOKS..BRENDA IS MULTI TALENTED AND A RARE BEAUTY TO TOP IT OFF
Of course Diana Krall is hot – she’s Canadian for heaven’s sake. All Canadian women are hot (just ask Elvis Costello).
I’VE NEVER MET YOU BRENDA, I’VE READ A LOT ABOUT YOU THOUGH AND I HAVE FALLEN IN LOVE WITH YOU..IF YOU WERE MY WIFE, I WOULD MAKE SWEET LOVE TO YOU BY CANDLELITE, SLOW, LONG LASTING GENTLE LOVE TO YOU..I COULD NEVER GET TOO MUCH OF YOU, I THINK YOU ARE A VERY BEAUTIFUL ASIAN WOMAN THAT I WOULD BE PROUD TO CALL MY WIFE
HOW YA DOIN’ PRETTY ONE, I WROTE A POEM ABOUT YOU CALLED–WHO IS BRENDA SONG–ONE LINE IN IT IS–HER FRIENDS ALL LOVE HER, THIS I KNOW, FOR MADDIE AND MOSBEY TOLD ME SO–I WANT YOU TO READ IT BUT DON’T KNOW HOW TO GET IT TO YOU. I’M A BIG FAN OF YOU BRENDA, YOU ARE A GOOD GIRL AND ALMOST TWENTY ONE, YOU ARE A BEAUTIFUL WOMAN AND YOUR ASIAN EYES ARE CAPTIVATING, YOU HAVE A VERY SEXY VOICE, IN FACT, EVERYTHING ABOUT YOU IS SEXY, YOU CAN SING GIRL, EVEN YOUR SINGING VOICE IS SEXY..I KNOW YOU LIKE PLAYING LONDON TIPTON, YOU ARE A GOOD ACTRESS TO BE ABLE TO PLAY HER AND SING OFF KEY ON PURPOSE TO BE FUNNY..ON SUITE LIFE ON DECK, YOU WRE PRETTY MEAN TO BAILEY IN ONE EPISODE BUT IT WAS FUNNY..YOU’RE A LITTLE DIFFERENT LONDON ON IT BUT YOU STILL PLAY DIM WITTED LONDON..I LIKE SEEING YOU BRENDA, YOU ARE SOOOO NICE TO LOOK AT, PRETTY GAL, ALL I CAN SAY IS A BIG–WOW
Cheryl Tiegs is beutiful by nature,when I was 16 my dad use to read her story in magazine,when he is through he also gave me to read,then I told my dad that she is beutiful,and you know what he tell me,what you know about beurry?
Am now 21,and still I log in her name and see her picture….she is the hottest model I HAVE EVER SEE.the model of now and then……
much love
kenya.
It is not enough to say that circumcision reduces the risk of this or that disease, or even reduces it by this or that percent. You need to know how great the risk is before you start, whether other means might give better protection, and how this much protection compares to the risks of circumcision itself.
Auvert chose to measure HPV in the urethra. This is the only part of the penis where circumcised men get less HPV than other men. It is clear he wanted to prove that circumcision provides protection, and by means like this, people are generally able to get the result that they want. Only some varieties of HPV put women at risk of cervical cancer, and the causation is only partial. Various studies have shown no greater incidence of cervical cancer in the wives of non-circumcised men.
The Nielson study was very marginal indeed, bordering on no statistical signficance at all.
The Baltimore study was not as clear as you say: Only a small sub-set of the men, those with known HIV exposure, showed the circumcision effect, but only 50 of those men were not circumcised, so the “22%” who contracted HIV was only 11 men. The study shows five of those men might not have contracted HIV if they had been circumcised – or if they had sex with other partners, or fewer partners, or used condoms more often, and so on. It is impossible to extract worthwhile statistical data from such small numbers. Meanwhile 2.5% of the vast majority of men, those who had no known HIV, risk did contract HIV, and among them, circumcision had no effect..
I agree. approaching is half the battle. It demonstrates confidence immediately, which all women find attractive.
I’m not clearly satisfied with the information that I read. I therefore foward my question to youand help me where you can. I have a problem, everyday when I go for exercise my body use to realese more sweat. I’m sure maybe they is some problem and since I was young I never been like this and I need help and advise from you. I’m waiting the answer from you through my email. thank you.
Like i always say you have to be consistent. Without consistency you will not achieve anything.
I’m eating 5 times a day to maintain 200lbs.
my stomach is not doing well these day.
any suggestions to maintain weight bulk
without much stress on stomach?
It is not enough to say that circumcision reduces the risk of this or that disease, or even reduces it by this or that percent. You need to know how great the risk is before you start, whether other means might give better protection, and how this much protection compares to the risks of circumcision itself.
Auvert chose to measure HPV in the urethra. This is the only part of the penis where circumcised men get less HPV than other men. It is clear he wanted to prove that circumcision provides protection, and by means like this, people are generally able to get the result that they want. Only some varieties of HPV put women at risk of cervical cancer, and the causation is only partial. Various studies have shown no greater incidence of cervical cancer in the wives of non-circumcised men.
The Nielson study was very marginal indeed, bordering on no statistical signficance at all.
The Baltimore study was not as clear as you say: Only a small sub-set of the men, those with known HIV exposure, showed the circumcision effect, but only 50 of those men were not circumcised, so the “22%” who contracted HIV was only 11 men. The study shows five of those men might not have contracted HIV if they had been circumcised – or if they had sex with other partners, or fewer partners, or used condoms more often, and so on. It is impossible to extract worthwhile statistical data from such small numbers. Meanwhile 2.5% of the vast majority of men, those who had no known HIV, risk did contract HIV, and among them, circumcision had no effect..
Nice post
Claire Danes is one of the hottest women alive…hot or not is a stupid question!
Francine Dee is one of the best beautiful lady among them.